Talk:Syntax
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Syntax article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Introductory sentence
[edit]This page has a strong introductory sentence that I believe is effect at communicating the purpose of the page. Keep up the great work! ~~~~ KauiLeFuJie (talk) 19:34, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2023 and 15 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sromero03 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Sromero03 (talk) 01:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Concatenation theory
[edit]It seems concatenation theory (also called 'theoretical syntax') would fit nicely under #Theoretical syntactic models, but I don't think I can work it into the article with confidence at this point. Tule-hog (talk) 00:34, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Linguistics articles
- Top-importance Linguistics articles
- C-Class Theoretical Linguistics articles
- Theoretical Linguistics Task Force articles
- C-Class philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class logic articles
- Mid-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Mid-importance philosophy of language articles